It perpetually amazes me that a nation of three coasts, three mountain ranges, 50 states and thousands of counties has just two political parties. This flies in the face of many values that allegedly define America, and it's a prime enabler of the collapse of discourse into vapid squabbling.

With Republicans firmly in control of local media and politics, running as a Democrat presents obstacles that have little to do with the candidate nor his/her ideas or qualifications. Why not short circuit this effect by forming local parties with a local name and platform?



continued...

The two parties long ago built major hurdles into the law to keep pesky third parties at bay. Never mind that there is no constitutional basis whatsoever for government to fund party primaries or to structure ballots around party labels, these arbitrary laws often survive court challenges. Reforming such laws might make a good foundation for a new party, but first they would have to get people in office.

As the law exists, the easiest way to gain ballot access is for an established candidate from either side of the divide to become a member of a new party. This could be an officeholder or anyone who lost an election but earned at least 20 percent of the vote. That's enough to get the party on a county ballot. Once.

There are a bunch of Democratic losers who are in good position to launch a local party. Wendy Pitts Reeves could found the Blount Preservation Party. Finbarr Saunders could start the Knox Moderates. There is more to be gained than lost by such an effort. For one thing, it could restore some sanity to politics by making it a little harder to paint a fellow citizen as an enemy.

WhitesCreek's picture

You may be right and It may already be happening

We work with the local Democratic Party and also OFA and DFA. We're finding a different crowd and some energized people away from the traditional party.

bill young's picture

But there is Hope!

Back in the day,I thought the McGovern folks would split from the Democrats & the Goldwater folks would split from the Republicans.

I agree the election law is often arbitrary if one
defines abitrary as based on ones "preference".

What I mean by preference is:

Back during the last income tax debate,a bunch of folks that wanted to go back to the Capital City,survived tough re election campaigns vs write-in candidates.

Those folks preference was to do something about
write-in candidates.

So they went to passin' all kinda election law to
make it hard to run as a write-in candidate.

Them sly dogs,up in the Capital City,has just 'bout legislated running as a write-in candidate useless.

That kinda of election law is where arbitrary runs smack dab into capricious.

And just one example of God knows how many examples
of election law being arbitrary & capricious.

It's why election law can be hard to cipher.

Because election law is like a "secret writing meant to
be understood only to those who have the key to it;code."

And often those who haunt the Capital City are
the only ones who have the "key" to the election "code".

Sometimes those folks ain't got a clue to the
arbitrary shit they've made law.

Then it's up to a Judge to cipher the election law.

But I would disagee that the election law is the culprit
for our 2 party system,in Tennessee.

The tool..yes..culprit..no.

The first culprit is..King Caucus.

It's got to with which Party elects the Speakers of
both Houses.

And controls the committees.

Smooth move on the House Speaker,last year.

But don't see that happening again.

If it's the Republicans who control..hope it's Rep.Brooks.

If it's the Democrats..it's Naifeh.

In the Senate..it's Ramsey.

Do not forsee members of either caucus moving to make
the Capital City non partisan.

The second culprit:

If it's good for the goose it's good for
the gander.

The partisans in the Capital City is just fine
with the partisans in the Courthouse.

And the Courthouse folks is fine with that,too.

Now the biggest culprit..SURVIVAL!

Few members of either caucus are willing to challenge the partisan county election structure.

A member of the state house simply doesn't have the campaign
organization the partisans in the Courthouse have.

State Senators can raise a bunch of money.
Got a chance to survive.

But very few if any want to take the risk of
challenging the partisans @ the Courthouse.

Then you got County Commission.

Is the Commission willing to change their partisan ways?

Tank..yep I know..but there's just one Tank.

It's going to be a Republican chair elected @ the
meeting.

BUT...BUT...There's HOPE!

All those Commissioners..with 6 year terms...
one maybe able to head them toward non partisan elections.

Big maybe..but the 6 year folks are the best chance you will ever have,Rikki,to do what you want to do.

So call em & by 2016 you could get 'em going your way.

That's not a smart ass comment..these 6 year folks will be there till September 1st,2016.

sugarfatpie's picture

I agree with most of what

I agree with most of what Rikki is saying.

Knox county's natural environment is one of the biggest loosers of the 2 party system. With the GOP having essentially conceded the environment as an issue to the Dems, and Knox Co firmly in the hands of the GOP, left in the lurch are the many many Knox countians I know who are concerned with the environmental direction our local politicians are taking us in.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives