bizgrrl's picture

I don't see the attraction of

I don't see the attraction of Urban Outfitters, especially for $500,000. Mast only got around $275,000 and they are kind of an attraction for tourists besides locals. Anyone out there ever shopped at Urban Outfitters? Seems a Target would have worked as well or better, if Target could be had for a $500,000 incentive.

bizgrrl's picture

Sounds great. She would know

Sounds great. She would know about fashion, whereas I do not.

Andy Axel's picture

People will drive from the

People will drive from the entire region

There are UO's in Birmingham, Nashville, Atlanta (x2), Asheville. Not exactly a regional shortage.

That doesn't mean that it won't be a draw, however. As far as Nashville is concerned, I don't know how well that the UO in The Gulch is doing - but I believe that they may suffer from an unfortunate concatenation of circmstances (local speculative overbuild right as the bottom dropped from the R/E market). It's not like the regulars at Station Inn are going to be bopping over to UO between sets.

Somebody's picture

Looks to me like they're an

Looks to me like they're an interesting retailer with a broad category of goods, and unlike Target, there aren't three other stores in town already. Downtown retailers still need to be something different. Somebody might go past their neighborhood Target to get to this place, but they're not going to do that to get to another Target downtown.

bizgrrl's picture

That makes sense.

That makes sense.

goose creek's picture

Gulch

I thought that was the store I visited in the gulch. I didn't understand the appeal but then I am Not their demographic. I got the impression it was an overhyped thrift store. But then hype sells, I suppose.

The question is: will they bring in enough tax revenue to justify the CBID investment?

Anonymously Nine's picture

.

"The question is: will they bring in enough tax revenue to justify the CBID investment?"

Break even of at least 5 years at $1,000,000 in sales per year. Will it sell a million a year at that location? That is $2,740 a day. That is a lot of yuppie anorexic clothing in a non yuppie anorexic location. How many people downtown can even fit into those clothes? This is a store that would be much better located at West Town or Turkey Creek. But then no $500,000. So we pay them to take a gamble. How smart is that?

Enter metulj to tell us it will draw from all over the region whatever that is.

But the better question is why should they get a taxpayer gift when other stores didn't? If I owned a store downtown I would be none to happy. So we give that gift and another store goes under. How smart is that?

Andy Axel's picture

Jos A Banks and

Jos A Banks and Anthropologie.

Was gonna say. They're not called "Suburban Outfitters."

The stores use retail space in converted buildings in downtown areas. It's part of their business model.

rocketsquirrel's picture

different approach

I'm on the fence as to a $500k grant directly to the building developer.

Austin Texas has a 24-month Business Retention and Expansion pilot program to use low interest loans to the businesses locating. looks like they've done two $250k deals, and they may both be restaurants, but the program is directed toward retail, too. Loans go up to $750K with city approval. seems like a better deal, creating a revolving fund for the CBID with a payback clause, rather than using direct grants.

rocketsquirrel's picture

downtown Austin already has

downtown Austin already has 362 downtown retailers. Imagine if they all "needed" $500k grants.

rocketsquirrel's picture

Faith and I peeked in Urban

Faith and I peeked in Urban Outfitters in Asheville this weekend. Cheap plywood and metal fixtures. stained concrete floors. Is it better to take $500k in CBID money to help fund low-interest loans to 10 or 20 retailers, or to the landlord who owns the building? Remember, Scott and Lisa started Bliss with low-interest Empowerment Zone money.

It's not a wash, Toby. the developer doesn't pay it back. The tenant's sales taxes pay it. and the purpose of the Austin program is business retention and expansion. It's directly to the businesses that will take the risk and generate the sales taxes, if they stay in business. The building will be there with or without. And if you deplete CBID funds for one developer welfare project, it will take 10-15 years longer than if you were to jump-start multiple retailers with low-interest loans. that's my point.

JaHu's picture

My son used to work in the

My son used to work in the clothing retail industry and he thought it was great that UO was opening a store downtown. He said it is the type of store unique to downtown Charleston SC. Maybe it will be a good draw for our city.

bizgrrl's picture

the type of store unique to

the type of store unique to downtown Charleston SC

I just don't see it. I realize the store is in town, I just don't see it as anything that makes Charleston, SC unique or unique to Charleston.

JaHu's picture

I just don't see it as

I just don't see it as anything that makes Charleston, SC unique or unique to Charleston.

I doubt if I ever will enter it's doors but it's obviously creating a stir.

My son was possibly referencing the stores in Charleston as being pricey. He didn't elaborate and I didn't pursue digging deeper into the details.

Maybe it will be another seed in the development of downtown. If gas prices keep rising like they are. We may all have to quit driving and move into the city. If we quit driving then there is no need for downtown parking. This in turn, will eliminate the need for parking lots. Without the parking lots, we would then have space for building housing units and we can all just walk to the stores. Anybody have a spare horse and buggy for sale?

katie granju's picture

destination retailer

Toby nailed it; UO is a "destination retailer." It's about more than the clothing. A downtown with a UO is a downtown that's "arrived" when it comes to the adult Cultural Creative demographic, which is one that Downtown Knoxville has to attract consistently and attract in larger numbers. I suspect it would also serve as an anchor tenant for fast follower retailers like Gap or a major chain bookstore (I know, some would not like that idea...) or even a boutique department store that would let UO take the risk and then move into the area behind them. Urban Outfitters would also be so appealing to teens and college students - the many thousands of UT students who are ripe for the plucking by retail - that they would make the effort to come downtown to shop and eat INSTEAD of hitting Turkey Creek. They aren't making that choice consistently now because Mast, as awesome as it is, isn't their thing. $500,000 is a huge amount of money. CBID is taking a gamble. But I tend to come down on the side of this being a really smart, innovative gamble that will end up as a big win for all of downtown. Waaaaaay better than a planetarium ;-) -Katie

Anonymously Nine's picture

good grief

"Toby nailed it; UO is a "destination retailer."

Oh yeah, he really nailed it.

"IF YOU BUILD IT THEY WILL COME".

That is a "destination retailer" in downtown Knoxville.

Michael's picture

Regal, etc.

I don't doubt that Regal has had a substantial impact downtown. But I can't help but note that the space adjacent to it (where Gridiron Burgers had plans to open) remains vacant.

For better or worse, one thing this does is take the focus away from Gay Street as a retail corridor. And that's too bad since multiple reports have pointed to Gay as the most desirable venue to develop retail.

To the Arnstein's west, Union does have ground floor space currently going to waste at the Residences at Market Square, and more retail space to come via Dewhirst's redevelopment of the Daylight Building. But as for developing the adjacent area, there's not a tremendous amount of potential. Home Federal has already both torn down the Sprankle and redeveloped it's property along Market. To the East is Krutch Park; to the South, an already redeveloped Market Square.

It's also worth mentioning that until its most recent sale, the Arnstein contained both a popular ground floor restaurant and some, if not most, of the upper floors were occupied. It will certainly benefit from the improvements. But a good deal of Gay Street is probably in greater need to make its spaces viable.

Part of me thinks that a revitalized Market Square is the real anchor here, and that Urban Outfitters hopes to piggyback on that success, rather than the other way around.
~m.

R. Neal's picture

Nama moving in next door to

rocketsquirrel's picture

Here's a link to some pics we

Here's a link to some pics we took this weekend of the Asheville store.

rocketsquirrel's picture

worry? not worried. but if

worry? not worried. but if the CBID thinks it can achieve a critical mass of retailers only attracting an occasional "major" retailer every 3-4 years...eg the progression it has taken to go from Mast to UO... it's sure as hell gonna take a long time for downtown to achieve that critical mass of non-restaurant retailers that was recently discussed in the MetroPulse article.

They chose not to hire a recruiter. That's their choice. Not necessarily required. But I'd at least have their board comb the lists of downtown retailers from other comparable markets and start making some pitches/site visits--just hope folks don't fixate on one project at a time and start thinking about a more comprehensive approach.

And I don't know the CBID fund balance. But my original point was thinking about low-interest loans vs. outright grants. Perhaps that could spread the money around a little better, or help us recruit out of our own backyard. With all due respect to other parts of town, perhaps--given incentives, because rent downtown is not currently reasonable for certain retailer profiles (eg Book Eddy probably does a lot more over the net than through the front doors), some local retailers might open another store downtown, like:

Book Eddy?
Emerys?
Bennett Galleries?
Gourmet's Market?
Westwood Antiques?
Butler and Bailey out at Rocky Hill?
Greenlife Grocery out of Chattanooga?

or thinking more broadly:
national scooter franchise?
Grayline Tours? (Asheville now has Grayline.)

Talk to target businesses, wherever they are, and then identify their barriers to entry. Then you can decide how to push the money in that direction. Don't just spend it on the building developers when you might need it for short-term rent subsidies to get to that self-sustaining critical mass.

Patrick Hunt's picture

Another action the CBID took

Another action the CBID took today was to adopt a strategic plan that specifically lists business recruitment and retention (with an emphasis on retail) and catalyst projects as our top two strategic priorities. This was an 8-month process in which the public was invited to participate. Many did, including property owners, retailers, residents, and visitors. Its the first strategic plan the CBID has had in as long as anyone can remember. The plan calls not only for identifying and funding projects we deem to have potential catalytic effects, but also to actively support property owners, brokers and other interested parties in the recruitment and retention of new businesses. This plan involves arming them with the tools and resources they need to be successful, getting the message out to specific businesses that downtown Knoxville is a great place to do business, providing online tools for finding properties and connecting with owners and brokers, and generating leads through networking, to name a few. In short, the entire recruitment and retention part of our strategy remains in tact as originally written, except there is no specific reference to hiring a recruiter. Be assured the board and staff are committed to recruiting new businesses to downtown.

We adopted this plan in part because we didn't believe as a board that "spreading it around a little" creates the greatest leverage. We want the money we invest to be returned ten-fold, not two-fold. National credit tenants offering 10-year leases at market rates are much more likely to create self-sustaining critical mass than short-term rent subsidies to businesses who can't afford those market rates to begin with. We are legally prohibited via our enabling legislation from providing rent subsidies; all of our grants must inure to the public domain. Hence our focus in recent years on facade renovation programs, which lower the cost of building renovation which in turn can make property owners more competitive with suburban locations. We've issued many such grants in $10-40,000 range over the last several years, and we've had a positive impact. But we believe that we are at different stage of downtown revitalization now, and we need different programs to take the next step forward.

The adoption of our strategic plan and the decision to make this grant are only the beginning of our efforts to recruit and retain businesses to downtown Knoxville. I don't think anyone on our board believes we will have been successful if we stop at Urban Outfitters.

rocketsquirrel's picture

Patrick, how do you measure

Patrick,

how do you measure the impact of those grants? sounds like up to this point, they've been for facade improvements only. Going forward, how will you measure outcomes for those grants? What are your performance measures?

Patrick Hunt's picture

This is a great question,

This is a great question, Doug. When I become chairman in July, I said I wanted CBID to focus on 3 things: focus, leverage, and outcomes. By focus, I feel it important that we really zero in on an important strategy. We have: business recruitment and retention. I'm expecting everything we do to be viewed through this lens. In re leverage, I want our investments to leverage significantly more, and more often than not be the deciding factor in whether a project happens. And by outcomes, I want us focused on exactly what happens as a result of our investment. That will be different for different types of projects, and we haven't finalized a standard set of metrics yet. But my guess is that it will be based first and foremost on increased property values, because property owners are the ones that fund CBID. We are working on these now, and I will keep the community posted.

BTW: I think your idea of a revolving loan fund may be spot on. Two other key elements of our strategic plan are 1) governance, and understanding better our legal authority to borrow, lend, bond, etc. and 2) identifying other potential revenue sources to fund our operations. If we can answer these questions, a fund as you suggest is a real possibility.

Andy Axel's picture

I don't know the catalyst(s),

I don't know the catalyst(s), but I imagine plenty of moolah was thrown around.

SXSW was probably a big part of it.

But it looks like they... gasp! ...plan. They're captive to the Hipster Urban Elitist interest.

(link...)

Michael's picture

Sales tax?

But it's for the building, not the retailer. The money just collects from the sales tax.

So there's some sort of deal whereby the CBID will be receiving a portion of sales tax?
~m.

Michael's picture

The Money

So far as I can determine, the grant money comes from the CBID. The CBID is funded by a special assessment on property owners within the district. Taxes, sales or otherwise, are not a part of its revenue stream.
~m.

Anonymously Nine's picture

.

"The CBID is funded by a special assessment on property owners within the district."

Pretty funny. A store owner pays a special assessment on property taxes to help a competitor's store undermine them.

Genius.

But they will say a raising tide raises all boats. Can you niche this enough to where it doesn't suck dollars from other stores?

Patrick Hunt's picture

Funny enough. Of 4 people not

Funny enough. Of 4 people not involved in the project to speak about it, 1 was retailer Andie Ray of Vagabondia. To paraphrase "We need this. Its overdue. Please approve this grant." We also had a letter from Mast General Store and Regal in support of Urban Outfitters in downtown Knoxville. Two other local, bootstrapped, independent retailers personally approached me to say "get this done." Mast, Vagabondia and the other two independent retailers have significant overlap with Urban Outfitters who, when viewed through a particular lens, could be construed as competition.

The existing retailers know that the rent they pay includes the cost of the CBID assessment. Yet, the small independent retailers have been among the strongest voices in support of our efforts to invest our money in recruitment and retention, particularly for retail. Because they get it. Turkey Creek isn't successful because of Target. Or because of Wal-mart. Or because of Starbucks or Earth Fare or Regal. Its successful because it has them all. For downtown, I don't necessarily think the Targets and Wal-marts will make us successful. It will take a mix heavily weighted toward local and regional retailers with unique offerings to compliment our unique history and architecture. We have a great collection of these already, including Yee Haw, Bliss, Reruns, Downtown Wine & Spirits, Morelock Music, Earth to Old City, Village Marketplace, and more. But a few investment-grade national and international retailers provide new levels of confidence and lower levels of risk for bankers, property owners and other retailers, including new independents, to do business downtown.

Jim Clark's picture

Source?

Michael, I have been following this debate silently and you have answered what I consider the most important question: Where does the money come from?

Several posters on knoxnews.com, for example, seem to believe that "our" taxes will be used to subsidize "their" businesses.

So will you please recommend a source to substantiate your claim?

btw I emailed Michele Hummel of the CBID board to ask him this same question this morning.

Michael's picture

Source?

Not sure I follow you. The info about the TIF and recommended city contribution are in the Flory article I linked above (still more from Flory on this deal). As for where CBID money comes from, there doesn't appear to be any info on that on their site (that I can find quickly). But you can refer to Patrick Hunt's (CBID's Board Chair) message above regarding the validity of where CBID gets its funds. And FYI, Michele is a she, not a he.
~m.

EDIT: This is from a recent MP article:
Created in 1993 with the mission to make downtown a better place to “live, work and play”—a phrase repeated ad nauseam by board members, the city, and developers—the CBID focuses on the one square mile of downtown between the Old City to Volunteer Landing and 11th St. to Hall of Fame Drive. It’s funded by 32 cents of every $100 collected on property taxes in that area, a sum that has about doubled in the past 10 years—from $233,116 in fiscal year 1999-2000 to $437, 008 in the 2008-09 fiscal year.

Patrick Hunt's picture

That bolded part of this text

That bolded part of this text is a bit misleading. The CBID assessment is completely separate and apart from City and County taxes. The property owners at the time voted to assess themselves (and future owners of property in the district) an additional $.32 above and beyond municipal tax rates--called a special assessment district--for the purpose of doing things above and beyond what the city can do legally, politically or fairly (to other taxpayers). That assessment is administered by an independent 501(c)3 organization called the CBID Management Corporation, whose membership is comprised of all legal entities that pay taxes and managed by a board elected by the membership.

Jim Clark's picture

Thanks!

Thanks, Michael and Patrick!

Mykhailo's picture

What are the competing shops

What are the competing shops to UO?

Doesn't Urban Outfitters have tons of knickknacky stuff? My wife bought a friend a Wonder Woman notebook at Urban Outfitters after her friend's gender change surgery, so if that's any indication of what they sell and the clientele they're targeting, I think they'd be competing pretty directly with Earth to Old City. But, bigger pie, rising boats, etc.

bizgrrl's picture

Look you could get a

Look you could get a Forever21 where all of the clothes come from slave labor in China and are at every price point.

Are you saying Urban Outfitters doesn't have products from China?

Patrick Hunt's picture

Why I Voted for This

Its true that this is almost twice as large a grant as CBID awarded Mast General Store, and that Mast is a terrific draw for downtown. But there are several key differences in these two deals.

Perhaps the most important reason to make this happen in my eyes is that Urban Outfitters has been a catalyst in other cities, most notably the 3rd Street Promenade in Santa Monica. Several other national credit tenants have followed them into areas they might not otherwise consider. Downtown Knoxville doesn't have the typical demographics in 1, 3, and 5 mile radii that many retailers require, so we have to be able to prove it to attract retailers. Mast, Regal, and hopefully now Urban Outfitters will be the critical mass needed to attract others.

Urban Outfitters (the store brand) is part of Urban Outfitters, Inc., a global retail company that also features four other brands, including Anthopologie, Free People, Terrain, and Leiffsdottir. Based on their SEC filings, we think Urban Outfitters generates $4-5 million per year per store. Mast is a regional retailer with 7 locations, and Knoxville is their top-performing store. I don't know their total revenues, revenues per store, or sales per square foot, but I don't think they are in this range. This has strong implications for employment and sales tax revenues in particular, but broader economic impact in general.

Lastly, I think Urban Outfitters has the potential to draw people to downtown that might not otherwise come. This includes UT students, who have only been recently making downtown a key part of their Knoxville experience, and local students who may attend other colleges and universities. The latter group will bring their parents. And I think there is simply a group of people in the region who think that Turkey Creek is all that Knoxville has to offer, and rarely ventures further East than West Town Mall. The growing collection of dining, shopping and entertainment options--combined with our unique history and interesting architecture--are quickly becoming a destination in their own right.

CBID's board meetings are open, and we invite public discussion. Its notable that of four to speak today, all four were in favor of it (though one expressed concerns about ability to pay, timing of payments, etc., all valid points). One of those speaking in favor was Andie Ray, an existing retailer on Market Square. To paraphrase, she said "We need this. Its long overdue. Sure, we'll compete for customers and dollars, but the pie will be bigger. We all win."

Michael's picture

Clarification

I'll assume that the property tax on the Arnstein will increase with improvements. And that will likewise increase the special assessment which is tied to the property tax. But I fail to see how additional sales tax figures into the equation at all.
~m.

Michael's picture

Recapture

I'm not certain whether the sales tax recapture is still extant or not. And there is/was a lot of devil in the details of that not worth getting into here. Because that's neither here nor there. Taxes are the domain of the city. It's apples and oranges. This is the CBID, not the city. And the CBID does not share in any way in sales tax. If sales tax doubled overnight in downtown, it would not affect CBID's revenue stream.
~m.

Patrick Hunt's picture

There is a sales tax

There is a sales tax recapture. The City can recapture all or a portion (I don't know which) of the state portion of sales taxes on businesses downtown (I don't know the specific percentage). This recapture flows to the City specifically to retire the debt on the convention center. It doesn't have a direct impact on CBID, but I personally want that debt retired as quickly as possible.

CBID will get an immediate bump in assessments from this deal. I am currently estimating it at $8,000 per year when it kicks in, with expected incremental increases every couple of years when new assessments are calculated. This income will persist as long as the CBID exists. The projected amount of incremental new property taxes to the City are $150,000 annually. I also believe this will increase the value of adjacent properties during the next appraisal period, which could increase both CBID assessments and City tax revenues. Of course, both the City and County retain their portion of the sales taxes generated from the store. Based on their SEC filings, the developers project that each UO store does $4-5 million is sales per year. At $4.5 million, the project will generate in excess of $400,000 in new tax revenues.

Patrick Hunt's picture

I may be off about sales tax

I may be off about sales tax recapture. Doing some digging. More to come.

bizgrrl's picture

Just an FYI RE Urban

Just an FYI RE Urban Outfitters on Wikipedia.

michael kaplan's picture

could you be referring to:

On November 27, 2009, the firm drew the attention of the Swedish press for denying collective bargaining rights to employees at their Stockholm store by making all 48 workers redundant and re-hiring them through employment agency Academic Work. In response to the move, ombudsman Jimmy Ekman called for tougher laws to prevent other firms from denying collective bargaining rights in this way.

wonder what their hiring and wage policies are here in the US. and how they compare to, say, those of tomato head.

Michael's picture

Taxes

Okay. So the recapture is still around. But as I said, it's apples and oranges.

I'm not giving a thumbs up or down to this project. That's not the point. But there seems to be a misunderstanding regarding where CBID gets it money. There's no doubt that, if successful, it will generate additional taxes. Substantial increases if we go by Patrick's numbers. But the CBID does not benefit from an increase in sales tax.
~m.

Michael's picture

Downside?

I haven't said anything about a downside. Just trying to clear up some confusion. Any time CBID does something and I hear about "taxpayer" money I cringe. The CBID doesn't get any tax money. It comes from commercial AND residential property owners downtown in an assessment that is above and beyond their taxes. Same goes for the idea that if sales taxes go up, it somehow benefits CBID's revenue stream. It doesn't.

As for the recapture thing, maybe Bill will chime in with the details. But as I recollect, it applies to how much taxes increase in the area around the Convention Center ABOVE the average increase in the city overall. It would be interesting to know how much, if any, benefit the city has seen from that program. And again, if I recall correctly, there's a time limit.
~m.

Patrick Hunt's picture

Michael, I think your

Michael, I think your description is right in re sales tax recapture. So there may not be an impact on recapture here. But, $400,000 plus in new sales taxes is still good for the City and County. Also, you are very right about where CBID money comes from.

StaceyDiamond's picture

UO

UO sounds exciting to me. Lots of downtown stores sale similar knick knackery stuff but during Christmas they all seem to be full, so wouldn't assume it would hurt anything. Just like at a mall folks seems to browse around in all of them.

StaceyDiamond's picture

Asheville

Did a search and it seems there was a debate last summer whether UO would hurt indie stores in Asheville. I would not think it would hurt Knoxville, but we'll see. Folks will find reasons not to like regardless.

edens's picture

Not sure what you're so fired

Not sure what you're so fired up about, Nine, seeing as downtown's subsidizing the county's tax base on their own dime...

Anonymously Nine's picture

.

"Not sure what you're so fired up about, Nine, seeing as downtown's subsidizing the county's tax base on their own dime..."

That tired rerun? Where do the sales tax dollars from Turkey Creek go?

edens's picture

Where do the sales tax

Where do the sales tax dollars from Turkey Creek go?

Compared to, say, the town of Farragut's sales taxes?

Now, seeing as the CBID's assessments - calculated as a percentage on property tax assessments - have almost doubled in the last five years, here's an extra credit question for you: which of Tennessee's 95 counties is the CBID in?

Dixie Belle's picture

Other aspects to

Other aspects to consider:

This is a facade grant for a 7 story building that comprises 192 windows. Windows can account for as much as 40% of your construction budget. The Arnstein is a gorgeous historic structure that will once again contribute to the vitality of Market Square and downtown at large.

A destination/anchor tenant like Urban Outfitters will undoubtedly attract other retailers to locate downtown, so the money spent to attract will in fact have a ripple effect.

Take a look around, we are about down to only large former department store spaces for new businesses. New locally owned shops can't afford more than 1200-1500 sq. feet of space. The only realistic tenants for these large spaces are large, likely chain stores. There isn't an Urban Outfitters on every corner. In fact, I believe there are only 155 in the US and Great Britain combined They will truly attract new feet on the streets.

The City enjoying 2.25% of their retail sales is great anyway you look at it.

Now, if all of the moving pieces can come together for this project to actually happen and open by Spring of next year...

edens's picture

Take a look around, we are

Take a look around, we are about down to only large former department store spaces for new businesses.

Speaking of, Patrick, the facade grant program's currently set up for encouraging renovation. Is the CBID looking ahead for strategies to promote infill on surface parking?

Patrick Hunt's picture

Funny you should ask. This

Funny you should ask. This topic has arisen at recent board and development committee meetings. The development committee recommended at this past Monday's meeting--and the board approved--new development incentive grant applications that reduce the emphasis on renovation and allow greater flexibility for new construction. The development committee also specifically rejected the idea of two programs, one for renovation and one for new construction, so as to keep things simple. My guess is that this is but the first step in a revamp of our grant programs, but that will be for the development committee and full board to decide.

Michael's picture

Hmmm

More from Flory.

I wasn't aware that the building had already received approval for a $1.1 millon TIF. The test for that is "but for" the TIF, the project wouldn't happen. I have to assume that in getting that approval, the city was presented with figures that would substantiate that with the TIF the project had enough money to succeed.

Now I'm wondering if, with the CBID providing nearly half that figure in a grant, and with the city agreeing to contribute an additional $200K, if the TIF is still in play.
~m.

KC's picture

I'd like to see what

I'd like to see what projections are like concerning these types of retailers.

I have a gut feeling a lot of these kinds of stores are going to lose steam in the near future.

People are saving more and spending less. And the stuff they're spending it on isn't necessarily this kind of trendy merchandise. At least, that's what the business and economic news seem to be reporting.

Recruiting these kinds of retailers may be a little behind the curve.

Rachel's picture

What I want to know is:

Does UO sell underwear?

I'm serious. I will be happy with downtown retail when I don't have to drive to west Knoxville to buy a pair of bloomers.

michael kaplan's picture

too bad watson's is gone

too bad watson's is gone

michael kaplan's picture

here's the UO story from

here's the UO story from sweden

michael kaplan's picture

right to work - for less. at

right to work - for less. at least we still have the right to spend our money where we want. ever see michael moore's the big one? i haven't shopped at borders since ...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TN Progressive

TN Politics

Knox TN Today

Local TV News

News Sentinel

    State News

    Wire Reports

    Lost Medicaid Funding

    To date, the failure to expand Medicaid/TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding. (Source)

    Search and Archives